tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8184208181444239184.post1424058519434934120..comments2024-03-14T13:25:42.698-04:00Comments on Child in Mind: Should pediatrics and child psychiatry marry for the sake of the children?Claudia M. Gold, MDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13081419560269676730noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8184208181444239184.post-20474423875798023402013-08-14T16:17:53.496-04:002013-08-14T16:17:53.496-04:00Hi clio
Thanks for your comment. I agree that educ...Hi clio<br />Thanks for your comment. I agree that educators have a lot to add. However, the conversation about early intervention is often in the setting of education- as evidenced by Obama's preschool for all program. But we know that early intervention is best focused on 0-3, and this age group, particularly infants, have much more broad interface with the healthcare system than the education system.Claudia M. Gold, MDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13081419560269676730noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8184208181444239184.post-76842585117386104622013-08-11T17:22:05.656-04:002013-08-11T17:22:05.656-04:00As an elementary school teacher married in reality...As an elementary school teacher married in reality to a primary care provider, I feel compelled to assert that their might be a place for educators in this marriage for the sake of the children! Childhood educators so often have insights to provide with regard to how kids and families operate over time and across settings, yet our input is rarely invoked in these mental health conversations. Conversely, the knowledge and understanding a variety of healthcare fields have to offer can be invaluable to pedagogues, yet the lines of communication are generally either closed or distorted due to outdated power dynamics. A marriage of convenience it is not, but a worthwhile one it most certainly is, particularly for the children.cliohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15886136554485501876noreply@blogger.com