Now that the
letters to the editor in response to the New York Times article
Drowned in a Stream of Prescriptions have been published, I am going to take advantage of this blog to publish mine.
There is one glaring error
in the generally well-researched and deeply disturbing article Drowned in a Stream of Prescriptions. In
a record review of Richard’s treatment the reporters found none of “the more conventional talk-based
therapies that experts generally consider an important component of A.D.H.D. treatment.”
If only this were true. Just last week, AAP Smartbriefs, a review of newsworthy
events in pediatrics, offered this headline
Non-Drug ADHD Treatments Don't Pan Out in
Study. The “psychological treatments” the study refers to are cognitive and
behavioral training and neurofeedback. Talk-based therapy isn't even mentioned.
What is noticeably absent
in Richard’s treatment is not talking, but listening. In the age of the
10-minute med check, there is no room for listening. If Richard was truly a
well functioning person until mid-college, was his primary diagnosis schizophrenia?
Was there some kind of trauma? In a world where ADHD is so quickly diagnosed,
there was no time given to fully hear his story. That time that might have
saved his life.
No comments:
Post a Comment